[Aryapatel-007]

Description

The pgcli --help output in the README is missing options that pgcli/main.py defines: --timeout, --application-name, -t/--tuples-only, --ping, --ssh-tunnel, --log-file, --init-command, -c/--command, -y/--yes and -f/--file. It also shows --warn [all|moderate|off], but the option now has no Choice type, so it's --warn TEXT.

Please check the formatting: I couldn't run pgcli --help in my environment. I built this block from the @click.option definitions, in their order, following Click's layout, so the spacing or wrapping may differ slightly from the real output. Replacing it with real output would be fine.

AI disclosure: this PR was generated by Claude Code (Claude Opus 5.5).

Update: when I opened this PR I hadn't run pgcli --help, as the note above says, and that check shouldn't have been left to you. I've since installed this branch and run it, and the README block matches the real output exactly at 80 columns. tests/test_main.py gave 93 passed and 23 skipped (those need a local Postgres server), and README.rst parses with docutils. I haven't tested against a live database.

Checklist

• I've added this contribution to the changelog.rst.
• I've added my name to the AUTHORS file (or it's already there).
• I installed pre-commit hooks (pip install pre-commit && pre-commit install).
• I verified that my changes work as expected (this may include manually testing them in your local environment). See the update above.
• Please squash merge this pull request (uncheck if you'd like us to merge as multiple commits)

[dbaty]

Please check the formatting: I couldn't run pgcli --help in my environment

Why is that? And if you have merely guessed what the output looks like, then aren't you putting the burden of checking on the maintainers' shoulders? I mean, we maintainers would probably have checked, but here we're not just checking: we're doing the work. So why submit a pull request? Just submit an issue, then.

Please do not submit pull requests if you do not or cannot use pgcli.

[Aryapatel-007]

You're right, and I'm sorry. I used an AI tool for this PR, and it couldn't run pgcli when it prepared it, so that check got left to you. That shouldn't have happened.
I've now installed this branch and run it. The block in the README matches the real pgcli --help output exactly at 80 columns. This PR only touches docs, so no code changed. In tests/test_main.py, 93 tests passed and 23 were skipped because they need a local Postgres server, which I don't have here.
If you'd rather not take an AI-assisted PR, I understand and will close it.