[thinhnx128]

Summary

Fixes #3813

Problem

ResourceManager.add_resource() checks self._resources.get(str(resource.uri)), logs a warning when self.warn_on_duplicate_resources is enabled, and returns the existing resource without overwriting it. However, ResourceManager.add_template() ignored self.warn_on_duplicate_resources and silently overwrote existing templates in self._templates[template.uri_template].

Solution

Check existing = self._templates.get(template.uri_template) in ResourceManager.add_template(), emit logger.warning(f"Template already exists: {template.uri_template}") when self.warn_on_duplicate_resources is True, and return existing consistently with add_resource().

[github-actions]

This PR has been closed automatically. This repo only keeps pull requests open when they come from a maintainer, or from a contributor a maintainer has assigned to the linked issue, and you aren't currently assigned to #3813.

If a maintainer assigns you to #3813, this PR reopens on its own and there's nothing more you need to do here. Assignment is a maintainer call based on capacity; comments that only ask to be assigned don't factor in. What does help is engaging on the issue itself by confirming the repro, explaining why it matters for your use case, or describing the approach you'd take.

You're welcome to keep pushing commits here (just avoid force-pushing, since GitHub can't reopen a rewritten branch), but that on its own won't get the PR reviewed or the issue assigned, and realistically most auto-closed PRs stay closed. There's no need to open a new PR either way.

CONTRIBUTING.md has the full reasoning, but in short:

• We're a small team with very little capacity to review community PRs right now.
• Many recent PRs are AI-generated with little human review, and reviewing one carefully still costs a maintainer as much time as it ever did. A well-described issue is usually more useful to us than the code.

Maintainers: reopen, remove missing-issue-link, or add bypass-issue-check to override.